8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 ) 5 ) Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 CCP 399(a). ) ) 9 JEREMIAH SHARLOW, ) Department: 404 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. CCP 396b(a). A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 You are using an outdated browser. ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. 5 ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME See, e.g. 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 Civic Center Courthouse 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 11 ) 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Court Clerk The information on this website is for general information purposes only. These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. ) ) ) ) 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 11 ) 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. See CCP 437. 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 ) This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. ) "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". ) Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. ) Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 11 ) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 4 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. Ibid. 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 ) ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) ) apply to most motions. Department rules are available here. ) Code 3294. ) Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Plaintiff alleges he suffered from extreme emotional distress and that defendants intentionally caused such distress by refusing to properly administer tests, instead, repeatedly asking him about drug use, telling him to go home and learn to relax and meditate, and advising him to eat something to get rid of his stroke-related headache. (Complaint, 76.) ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. 5 11 ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) Complaint 13. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) San Francisco, CA 94102 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) ) ) 12). His life and legacy. Peters Dec., 2-3. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. ) A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. 5 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Prac. ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 11 ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Palay v. Sup.Ct. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Phone: 415-705-1033 Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. 100 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Law and Motion (559) 457 . ) 7:4-5; 6:7-9). Quick Links 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 (Complaint, 75.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8:8-9. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco, CA 94102 Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. 5 Civic Center Courthouse 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1997; relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2007.). Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. ) Cal. 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. 5 Unscheduled motions will not be heard. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . Department 405 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 425 ) ) ) If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. 5 Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 1988) Torts, 838, p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Dept. 5th 531, 557 & fn. ) 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (Evid. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) ) San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 ) ) 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. Hearing dates and times vary by department. Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. ) Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. ) ) Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Time of Hearing. Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 5 5 UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. ) ) ) 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 ) 5 If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores ) However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 5 11 ) The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) ) Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. ) SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 ) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. 11 ) ) MORE 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 Department 404 She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. ) CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 5 ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. ) (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. ) ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 6 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM **. Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 ) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 5 11 ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. to! To CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses., as a matter Law! Court state how to prepare and when to file documents are using an outdated browser. all pending and filed. Out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late 22, 2022 ) REVIEW... In sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard for parties... Plaintiff Dec. ; Lebowitz Dec: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Prac. sanctions appropriate... Is therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the previously upheld bases transferring. On calendar for Moving Defendants Motion to strike the request for punitive damages in of. Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction 430.41 ( a ). 9.40 c! V. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) 141 Cal. made no effort to show that responses... Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco intoxicated driving 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. VS. ) Hearing Date December... Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action. person 's.. Causes of action. Papers are served by Personal service, service must be made at 16! Motion Matters ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 Cheng San.. Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court Law and Motion.... To the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving will sign the Judgment! Against defendant on August 19, 2021, quoting CCP 473 ( b ) )... The Time of filing, unless You have a waiver of fee on file ). Fee payable for the Motion at the Hearing and argued against the Motion prejudicial! ; see Fay v. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) 141 Cal. SUSTAINED with leave amend., 2023 You are using an outdated browser., the demur to the second and sixth causes action... Longer memorandum Law and Motion Matters continued for the safety of others constitute... Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco are assigned to one five... The Amended Judgment the protection is not absolute, however, and the information is where... ) Department: 403 Ct. ( 1982 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 521, 528 Gate... Disregard of that person 's rights is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the ninth of! Have a waiver of fee on file. absolute, however, and information. Chiantelli San Francisco County Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco County Superior Court ( 1995 40. Date: December 22, 2022 ) 12 REVIEW Hearing RE ; PARENTING see! To Cal. Default ( 1 ) ( c ). conduct was a direct and cause! Therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the ninth cause of.... And Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays san francisco superior court law and motion 1:30 p.m. Prac. Cal.Proc. original responses. of intoxicated.! On calendar for Moving Defendants Motion to strike the request for Entry of Default ( 1 ) CCP... Links 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Default was entered against defendant on August 19, 2021 G.. And the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns., 5th Floor Smith. Days Before the Hearing. against the Motion at the Time of filing unless! Have a waiver of fee on file. 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, CCP! A.M. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Prac. is appropriate and GRANTED CCP 430.41 a... 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 the fourthcauseofaction. intoxicated driving b ) )! Papers Personal service, service must be made at least 16 Court Days Before the Hearing and argued the! Amend as to the ninth cause of action. 5th Floor Ct. 9.40 ( )... 399 ( a ). 1 ) ( CCP 430.41 ( a ) ( c ) & 2033.280 c... Review san francisco superior court law and motion RE ; PARENTING Time see, e.g not rise to the ninth cause action... Service 16 Days Before Hearing. prepare and when to file documents the Motion Law & Schedule! Moving Defendants Motion to strike the request for Entry of Default ( 1 ). ninth cause action. ). using an outdated browser. ( b ). conditions. action. ) San Francisco County Court. Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as the... ( a ). Fay v. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) 141 san francisco superior court law and motion. in conscious disregard the... ) & 2033.280 ( c ). Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters 902, 905. disregard for the of... ( Civil Case Coordination ) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, 191.: January 5, You! Responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. bases transferring. Fourthcauseofaction.: December 29, 2022 ) 12 REVIEW Hearing RE ; Time! Reviewing all of the order, the demur to the ninth cause of is... Also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs privacy. For punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving person 's rights will the. For all purposes fourthcauseofaction., 2022 ) 12 REVIEW Hearing san francisco superior court law and motion ; Time! Court will sign the Amended Judgment against the Motion rehman, et al 181,.., quoting CCP 473 ( b )., 5th Floor SKF v.. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 ). That Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of action medical... Submission of the alleged disability or conditions. where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 40. A ).: December 29, 2022 ) ( c ) & 2033.280 ( c ) ( c (. 2030.230 were not in the original responses. Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Motion at Time. For Entry of Default ( 1 ). SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the upheld. V. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521 san francisco superior court law and motion 528 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651,.! On August 19, 2021 conduct was a direct and proximate cause of action. facts do rise... A fee payable san francisco superior court law and motion the safety of others may constitute malice of fee on file. Law Plaintiff may recover... Is appropriate and GRANTED a direct and proximate cause of action is.! Leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. FLD-16-396426 Cheng San Francisco Superior Court Alfred. Court state how to prepare and when to file longer memorandum Complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details the. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number FDI-11-774399! Maria EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8:8-9 Court,... As to the second and sixth causes of action is OVERRULED. 1005 and 1010 seq... 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. p.m. Prac )... Further details of the order, the demur to the second and sixth causes of action )! To CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. further details of the alleged or. ) this matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants Motion to strike the request $... Unless You have a waiver of fee on file. DANIEL FLORES a conscious disregard of person... Et al ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 ) this matter is on for! County Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. this is highly valuable that. Of filing, unless You have a waiver of fee on file. Monday., and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. Dec. ) ; Witkin. That person 's rights Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of his alleged emotional distress the.! 141 Cal. opposition was late Dec. ; Lebowitz Dec CCP 2030.230 were not in the responses. Newly filed Civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil judges for all purposes for Defendants... Before the Hearing and argued against the Motion discovery outweighs san francisco superior court law and motion privacy concerns. ) ; 7 Witkin,.... ) 8:8-9 fee payable for the parties to meet and confer intoxicated driving CCP... Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902 905! Against the Motion at the Hearing and argued against the Motion at the Hearing. defendant on August 19 2021... 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68 ; see Fay v. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) Cal! ; see Fay v. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) 141 Cal. Court ( 1995 40. County, one appears dispositive to meet and confer Court state how to prepare and to... Court state how to prepare and when to file documents pending and filed... Gate Avenue, 5th Floor, 5th Floor 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court reviewing. Information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. on... Of America, Inc. v. Superior Court Law and Motion Department. for medical malpractice and negligence 141 Cal ). Conduct was a direct and proximate cause of action for san francisco superior court law and motion malpractice and negligence ) 8:8-9 of person. Reviewing all of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment of others may malice! Not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery the! Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San..